Banning Islamophobia: Blasphemy Law by the Backdoor
3 March 2024
Tim Dieppe
Tim Dieppe, the Head of Public Policy at Christian Concern, believes that any attempt to define ‘Islamophobia’ and punish those responsible for it, whether by cancelling them or changing the law to make ‘Islamophobia’ a ‘hate crime’, would have a chilling effect on free speech. That is particularly true of the All Party Parliamentary Group on British Muslim’s definition, which, among other things, means anyone who disputes Hamas’s description of Israel’s military operation in Gaza as a ‘genocide’ is guilty of ‘Islamophobia’ and, by extension, of ‘racism’. It is not ‘racist’ to dispute that claim, any more than it is ‘racist’ to criticise the religion of Islam or to acknowledge that the history of Islam involves spreading the religion by the sword and subjugating non-Muslims. We should continue to be vigilant against anti-Muslim hatred, but consign the word ‘Islamophobia’ to the dustbin of history.
Download this publication as a PDF ↓
Defining Islamophobia would bring back blasphemy law by stealth
The FSU has launched a legal challenge against the Government's Islamophobia definition and publishes expert analysis of every attempt to restrict criticism of religion. Join 40,000 members standing up for free expression. From £29.99/year.
Join the FSU Today