A Christian teacher who told Year 7 pupils that being LGBT was a sin has lost a High Court fight. The Telegraph has the story:
Glawdys Leger made the comments to her pupils during a religious studies lesson at Bishop Justus CofE School in Bromley, south London, in February 2022.
She showed a presentation on human rights and the class had a discussion on “allyship”, which led to Ms Leger saying that being LGBT was “not fine” and her pupils should put God before such ideology, a professional conduct panel found.
The panel also found the 44-year-old said being LGBT was a sin and transgender people were “just confused”.
One of the pupils complained to her mother about the comments and Ms Leger was suspended in March 2022 before being dismissed two months later.
In December 2023, the panel found her actions amounted to unprofessional conduct, with the finding then published on the Teaching Regulation Agency’s website. Ms Leger was not prohibited from teaching in future.
Ms Leger brought legal action at the High Court in London against the Department for Education over the panel’s findings.
She argued the panel failed to put her comments in context and that the school’s duty to provide a broad and balanced curriculum did not apply to her as an individual teacher.
She also said the decision to publish the finding was unlawful as it infringed on her privacy.
But her case was dismissed by Mrs Justice Lang on Thursday who said Ms Leger’s criticisms of the panel’s findings “do not disclose any error of law, as opposed to mere disagreement”.
She said in a written judgment: “The [panel] and the secretary of state made a lawful decision that publication of the findings was a justifiable and proportionate sanction for her unacceptable professional conduct.”
A previous hearing was told Ms Leger’s comments were recorded by an 11-year-old pupil who had been advised by her mother to note down any “transphobic” remarks.
The mother then complained to the school, saying Ms Leger’s comments were “very distressing” for her child as she is “exploring who she is – as many children are at this age”, Mrs Justice Lang said.
Ms Leger argued to the High Court that the panel’s publication had interfered with her human rights because, although she was not prohibited from working, the publicity of the decision would make it “difficult, if not impossible, to obtain new employment”.
But Mrs Justice Lang said the panel was compelled to publish its finding and “went no further than it considered justified”.
The published decision will become inaccessible after two years, even to employers, she added.
Worth reading in full.
