Take Action

Saturday, July 27, 2024

MAKE A DONATION

Get in Touch

Member Login

BECOME A MEMBER

Join Today

Live Campaigns

Use our campaigning tool to write to your MP

The Government’s proposed “full, trans-inclusive ban on conversion practices” raise serious free speech concerns

The UK Government has said it intends to bring forward a “full, trans-inclusive ban on conversion practices”. The aim of the Bill will be to ban “conversion practices”, defined as “acts that aim to change someone’s
sexual orientation or gender identity”. We believe this could have a chilling effect on free speech and encourage our members to write to their MPs, using our template letter, to express these concerns.

Most agree that harmful practices like pseudo-scientific ‘treatments’ or ‘re-education’ camps should have no place in contemporary Britain. But those practices are already against the law. So what is it, exactly, the Conversion Practices Bill will ban?

Our main concern is that the definition of “conversion practices” in the Bill will include benign conversations around sexuality or gender identity. This could result in criminalising personal advice, parental guidance, or religious teachings.

The possibility that the ban might include conversations between parents and children about gender identity is particularly concerning. We worry that, as a result of this ban, parents could face imprisonment for dissuading their children from undergoing irreversible medical procedures. Similarly, health professionals might be prevented from giving advice they believe to be in the best interest of gender-confused children, such as urging them to pause and reflect before having life-changing surgery. It’s not enough for the Government to claim that “those providing medical care and support are in no way impacted by this Bill”. If a health professional refuses to affirm the self-diagnoses of a trans adolescent who demands medical treatment to enable them to transition, it’s unclear how they won’t be caught by the ban.

Given the severity of these implications, the Free Speech Union is urging its members to write to their MPs to highlight these concerns. We need to make sure that freedom of speech remains protected, particularly in sensitive and potentially life-altering circumstances.

Time remaining for you to raise this issue with your local MP:

Days

Hours

Minutes

Seconds

Thank you for your interest in this campaign. The window has now passed for you to contact your MP about this matter.

Here’s how you can take action

We strongly urge you to voice your concerns about any proposed “conversion practices” ban by reaching out to your local MP.

While certain harmful practices should indeed be banned – and are banned – this legislation could infringe on free speech, parental rights, and the ability of medical professionals to provide appropriate care. It’s essential that we communicate these concerns to our representatives to ensure they understand the potential ramifications and take them into account during the legislative process.

Please take a few minutes to fill out the form below. It’s a simple, fast process that can have a significant impact. We’ve even provided a template to help, but feel free to personalise it with your concerns. Your voice matters and this is an important opportunity to make it heard.

Write to MP

Enter your postcode

Your local MP

Your constituency is:

Your MP is:

Email:
Telephone:

Write your message

Feel free to customise our template

Dear {{name}},

I am writing to express my concern about the Government’s proposal to bring forward a “full, trans-inclusive ban on conversion practices”. I oppose all coercive or violent attempts to change a person’s sexual orientation or gender identity and it is right that, as the previous government’s 2021 consultation briefing on conversion therapy put it: “Our existing criminal law framework means that conversion therapy amounting to offences of physical or sexual violence is already illegal in this country.” However, the Government’s Conversion Practices Bill threatens to have negative consequences for freedom of speech, particularly in relation to gender identity.

To begin with, I am concerned about the impact of such a ban on the freedom of speech of religious leaders, e.g., it should not be a criminal offence for a religious leader to tell a member of their congregation that homosexuality is a ‘sin’ or ‘haram’. In the state of Victoria in Australia, which banned conversion therapy in 2021, it is a crime punishable by up to 10 years in jail and a fine of up to £100,000 for a religious leader to have a one-to-one conversation with a member of their congregation in which they persuade them to practice celibacy rather than act on their feelings of same-sex attraction.

The prospect of the state prohibiting, on pain of imprisonment, what a religious leader is able to say to a member of their faith about what their religion teaches about homosexuality is alarming enough. But even more worrying is the prospect that conversations between parents and children about their gender identity will be caught by the new law.

My concern is that a “full, trans-inclusive ban on conversion practices”, which is how the Bill was described in the King’s Speech, would bring conversations between parents and their children within scope of the ban, effectively meaning parents who attempted to dissuade their children from having risky medical treatments could be prosecuted. In the state of Victoria, for instance, it’s a crime for a parent to refuse to support their child’s request for puberty blockers, and in Switzerland, where conversion therapy is banned in some cantons, a 16 year-old girl has been removed from her parents’ custody because they refused to let her take puberty blockers.

The danger of this Bill is that various legitimate alternatives to life-changing medical treatment – such as referring a young person with a history of mental illness who identifies as trans to a psychotherapist before they decide to embark on surgery, or simply encouraging them to pause and reflect – could fall foul of a ban on “conversion practices”. In this way, the Bill could force medical professionals to rule out treatments they believe are in the best interests of gender-confused children – forcing them to break their Hippocratic Oath. Former clinicians at the Tavistock Clinic have reported that they were subject to unfounded accusations of ‘transphobia’ for recommending a ‘watchful waiting’ approach, i.e., recommending gender-confused adolescents pause and reflect before embarking on life-changing medical treatments, and there is a risk that this Bill will criminalise such advice. Doctors have both a right and a duty to recommend what in their judgment is the best clinical pathway for a patient who identifies as trans, particularly if that patient is a child.

It's not enough for the Government to claim that “those providing medical care and support are in no way impacted by this Bill”. If a health professional refuses to affirm the self-diagnoses of a trans adolescent who demands medical treatment to enable them to transition, it’s unclear how they won’t be caught by the ban. At the very least, a “full, trans-inclusive” ban will end up tilting the scales in favour of the ‘gender affirmative care’ approach.

This is important, given that research on and around gender identity is still in its infancy, and it cannot be ruled out that in some cases identifying as trans may be symptomatic of a mental disorder – ‘gender dysphoria’ still appears in the latest edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, the Bible of the American psychiatric profession.

Nor can it be ruled out that an adolescent who identifies as trans and wants to embark on transitioning is simply being swept along by a trend within their peer group or on social media. If they are not persuaded to wait before undergoing a life-changing medical procedure, such as a double mastectomy, they may come to regret it, as many people have. Is it really in the best interests of such adolescents to criminalise attempts by parents or clinicians to make them pause and reflect before permanently changing their bodies?

I am not in principle opposed to a ban on conversion practices, although I have yet to be persuaded that the sort of practices that should be banned, such as attempting to change a person’s sexual orientation or gender identity through pseudo-scientific quack ‘treatments’, are not already illegal. But I believe there is a serious risk that if “conversion practices” ends up being defined too broadly in this Bill – or too vaguely – it will have a negative impact on the free speech of religious leaders, medical professionals and parents and, in some cases, that could lead to children undergoing life-changing medical treatments they later come to regret.

As your constituent, I am asking you to scrutinise this Bill very carefully and make sure the risks it poses to free speech are avoided.

Email preview

I'm happy for the FSU to process and store my information *required I'm happy to receive future content for FSU

Live Campaigns

Use our campaigning tool to write to your MP

The Government’s proposed “full, trans-inclusive ban on conversion practices” raise serious free speech concerns

Time remaining for you to raise this issue with your local MP:

Here’s how you can take action

Enter your postcode

Your local MP

Write your message

Email preview

Join Our Community

Quick Links

Organisation Address

Welcome to the Free Speech Union