We use cookies to enhance your browsing experience, serve personalized ads or content, and analyze our traffic. By clicking "Accept All", you consent to our use of cookies.
Customize Consent Preferences
We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.
The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ...
Always Active
Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.
No cookies to display.
Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.
No cookies to display.
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
No cookies to display.
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
No cookies to display.
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.
“Controlling the Narrative”: Free Speech Under Fire
BY
Frederick Attenborough
Looming threats to free expression and the deplatforming of dissenting voices came to the fore last month when NatCon Brussels, an annual event gathering conservative thinkers, politicians, academics, and heads of state from across Europe, experienced multiple attempts at cancellation, including a police raid ordered by a local mayor, reports Thomas O’Reilly for The European Conservative. Here’s an extract:
“Unfortunately, this is not the first instance where freedom of speech has come under attack in Brussels or Belgium,” said attorney Yohann Rimokh, who is representing NatCon Brussels co-sponsor MCC Brussels in their legal challenge against municipal authorities in the aftermath of the events. It is, however, the first time an administrative decree has been used to halt a conference where a prime minister of a member state was slated to speak, he said.
Rimokh was one of the panellists when think tank MCC Brussels hosted a discussion on the subject and its release of Controlling the Narrative: The EU’s attack on online speech, a report by visiting research fellow Dr. Norman Lewis on Wednesday, May 15th.
How the EU systematically controls speech online
A thread on our report from @Norm_Lewis launched today.
The EU has created a dangerous network of NGOs, fact-checkers and Big Tech to strangle free speech online.
Lewis, agreeing with Rimokh, warned that establishment attempts at silencing nonconformist voices at NatCon is far from an isolated event, but part of a pattern. He said further coordinated efforts to that effect are underway, and to expect a raft of onerous new EU edicts to curb innovation and free speech online. The European Commission has already tightened the screws on Facebook and Instagram for not complying with its demands to ‘regulate’ political content in the run-up to June’s European elections.
Lewis said Brussels bureaucrats are “institutionalising laws against hate speech and disinformation” in the quest for political supremacy. Recently implemented legislation, such as the Digital Services Act (DSA), is just the opening salvo of a wider campaign to clamp down on online dissent, Lewis said.
International relations professor Bill Durodié, one of the panellists, referred to EU hate speech regulations as a way to “patronise minorities and protect the elite.”
According to Lewis, censorship in the Western world will “only increase in the future as it becomes automated and automatic,” accelerated by AI technology and what Eurocrats see as a moral stance,—in reality, a thin veneer masking an embryonic “oligarchy.”
Lewis also explained how content moderation is becoming an essential tool in the EU’s foreign policy objectives under the guise of ‘fighting disinformation.’ Fear mongering—about Russian or Chinese ability to spread “‘poison that can colonise’ the minds of ordinary Europeans”—is used to justify control of public discourse and limitations to what information is deemed appropriate for the populace to access—and share.
“The irony of defending democracy by curbing free speech seems to elude the Brussels elite,” Lewis says in his report.
As a member, you’ll have access to an array of resources and support, ensuring you can speak your mind without fear of being cancelled. Our experienced team provides guidance, support and – at our discretion – assistance with legal action. We will defend your right to speak your mind, however unorthodox your views, provided you don’t say anything unlawful.