Friday, May 9, 2025
MAKE A DONATION
Get in Touch
The Free Speech Union
Member Login
BECOME A MEMBER
  • Home
  • About Us
    • About Us
      • Company Staff
      • Founders & Board
      • Advisory Council
      • Legal Advisory Council
      • Writer’s Advisory Council
      • Scottish Advisory Council
      • Northern Ireland Advisory Council
    • The Freedoms We Defend​
      • Freedom of Speech
      • Freedom of Expression
      • Academic Freedom
      • Freedom of the Press
      • Freedom of Religion
    • Scotland
    • Northern Ireland
  • Latest News
  • FAQS
  • Resources
    • Informative Guides
      • Online Offences Related to Civil Disorder FAQs
      • FAQs About Scotland’s Hate Crime Act
      • FAQs About What to do if You’re Contacted by Police Scotland About a Speech-Related Complaint
      • Freedom of Speech Online FAQs
      • Freedom of Expression on Campus FAQs
      • How to Make a Freedom of Information Request
      • Gender Pronouns in the Workplace
      • How to Remove Non Crime Hate Incident from your Police Record
      • Navigating Social Media and the Workplace
      • What to do if You’ve Been De-Banked
      • Anti-Racism and Unconscious Bias Training
      • The Governments Consultation on Reforming the Human Rights Act
    • Briefing Documents
    • Press Releases
    • Media
    • Letters
    • Teaching Materials
  • Videos
  • Podcasts
    • Weekly News Podcast
    • Guest Interviews & Debates
  • Events
  • Campaigns
    • Labour’s War on Free Speech
    • Higher Education Act
    • Conversion Therapy Ban
    • Say No to Banter Bouncers
    • Time to Scrap Non-Crime Hate Incidents
  • Apply For a Grant
  • Shop
The Free Speech Union
Join Today

French news channel fined for airing unchallenged negative views about migration and climate change

  • BY Frederick Attenborough
  • July 21, 2024
French news channel fined for airing unchallenged negative views about migration and climate change

Popular Conservative French news channel CNews has been fined €80,000 by the country’s media regulator for expressing negative viewpoints regarding migration and climate change without offering suitable commentary for balance – news of the regulatory intervention comes in the wake of research showing publicly funded media channels in the country overwhelmingly field left-wing guests and promote left-wing ideas.

The French Communications Regulation Authority, Arcom, imposed two financial penalties on CNews, for “failing to meet its obligations”.

Under French media regulations laid down in a 1986 law, all channels, whether public or private, must give equal airtime to people from different political parties during electoral periods.

One fine of €60,000 was given over a broadcast late last year, where two studio guests declared “immigration kills…without any reaction from the host or the other people present on set”, the media regulator wrote in its decision.

“The use of the formula ‘immigration kills’ by two guests is likely to represent people of immigrant origin, as a whole, as a deadly risk factor,” Arcom ruled, adding: “Such stigmatisation, which reduces immigrants to the status of dangerous people… is likely to incite hatred against them because of their race, nationality or ethnic origin and encourage discriminatory behaviour towards them.”

The other penalty of €20,000 was in light of another broadcast, in July 2023, when a guest stated: “Anthropogenic climate change is a lie, a scam. At some point, we need to look at things scientifically; it’s not a law of science.

“There has been global warming since the mid-19th century, but it follows a mini ice age … so the climate has always evolved and will continue to do so. But to explain that it’s because of humans, no, that’s a conspiracy.

“And why does it carry so much weight?”, the guest continued. “Because it justifies state intervention in our lives, and it also absolves the state from having to reduce its public spending. Elisabeth Borne [the then Prime Minister] announced that we’re going to spend €60 billion a year to fight against… against this so-called warming.”

“This way, the State says, ‘Well, I can’t make savings, there’s global warming.’ It’s very convenient, and it allows intervention in the agenda, in people’s lives, housing, transport, industry, agriculture, and it’s… for me, it’s a form of totalitarianism. As a liberal economist, it’s a form of totalitarianism.”

Again, Arcom ruled that there had been no attempt at balance.

GB News has accused Ofcom of a “sinister” attack on democracy after it threatened the broadcaster with a fine following an investigation into a programme featuring PM Rishi Sunak that it claims represented a "serious breach" of broadcasting impartiality.https://t.co/prukmfeNJ8

— The Free Speech Union (@SpeechUnion) May 22, 2024

“The participant was thus able to express a controversial thesis not verified by established scientific data without the position he defended being put into perspective and without any contradiction on this subject being expressed following these remarks,” the regulator said. 

CNews, which is part of the Canal+ group owned by the billionaire industrialist Vincent Bolloré, has in recent years seen viewing figures soar.

Dubbed by critics ‘the French Fox News’, it features rowdy debate shows dealing with issues like immigration and crime, which mainstream channels choose to ignore. According to the channel’s director general, Serge Nedjar, while these subjects were “for a very, very long time… classed as being the topics of the far right”, today they are “what interests 80% of French people”.

News of the regulator’s intervention follows the French Council of State – the country’s highest administrative court – overturning an initial decision by the media regulator not to act against CNews.

Last year, Arcom’s president, Roch-Olivier Maistre, argued that CNews “strictly respected political pluralism” in terms of the amount of speaking time given to politicians. While acknowledging that it was “becoming an opinion channel” on the lines of conservative Fox News in the US, he went on to say that it was not the regulator’s job to look at the channel’s commentators.

However, in February 2024, a case brought by campaign group Reporters sans frontières argued that the Canal+ channel had breached its legal obligations, and that Arcom had ignored repeated calls for it to remind the news channel of its obligation to ensure the “honesty, independence and pluralism” of its coverage.

Ofcom is hiring Big Tech execs from Silicon Valley to implement sweeping new surveillance and censorship measures given to the regulator under the Online Safety Act — a team of 350 unelected regulators is now empowered to police our free speech online.https://t.co/TdGIRzYUUc

— The Free Speech Union (@SpeechUnion) January 13, 2024

The judge in the case subsequently criticised Arcom for limiting its ruling to the compliance issue over how much airtime had been given to political figures, rather than examining whether the channel was presenting true diversity of thought and opinion, and gave it six months to examine whether CNews was complying with its obligations to ensure “balanced and independent” journalism.

Using vague and capacious language, the State Council went on to say that the regulator should assess news independent “in terms of the channel’s operating conditions and programming characteristics”.

In a statement, Arcom welcomed the decision, which effectively expands what is currently considered ‘editorial content’ for regulatory purposes, to include contributions from pundits as well as politicians.

“With this renewed interpretation of the 1986 law,” Arcom said, “the Council of State strengthens the capacity of control by the regulator of the obligations of these media in terms of honesty, pluralism and independence of information, while respecting their editorial freedom.”

However, others expressed concern at the ruling. Speaking on CNews following the hearing, journalist Franz-Olivier Giesbert described the court’s decision as “very serious, unbelievable”, saying France was “heading, bit by bit, towards a government of judges”.

Eugenié Bastié, a regular contributor to CNews, questioned how the tighter controls would be applied. “Will commentators have to declare who they vote for?” she asked on X.

Meanwhile Eric Ciotti, head of the conservative Republicans party, spoke of an “inquisition” into the opinions of commentators and journalists.

Former GB News presenter Mark Steyn has asked a High Court judge to quash two Ofcom rulings that his on air questioning of Covid vaccines breached its guidelines, arguing they lack "clarity and coherence" and risk an "obvious potential chilling effect".https://t.co/HPKsMIYXZi

— The Free Speech Union (@SpeechUnion) June 13, 2024

News of CNews’s financial sanction by a regulator with a now substantially expanded purview comes in the wake of research which found that French media broadcasters are illegally discriminating against those on the political Right.

According to the Thomas More Institute report, published in May, publicly funded television and radio channels in the country are overwhelmingly fielding left-wing guests and promoting left-wing ideas, despite having a legal obligation to be politically balanced in their coverage.

Analysing a list of 587 guests who appeared on France’s most prominent publicly funded media between February 19 to 24, 2024, researchers found about half of them could be considered politically neutral, 25 per cent fell under the “Socialist and progressive” label, while another 21 per cent of the guests were viewed as holding a “Macronist” Liberal point of view. By contrast, just 4 per cent – or 26 people – were classified as leaning to the Right.

Of those brought on to discuss climate and ecology, 65.6 per cent held pro-green agenda views, while 57 per cent expressed disapproval for politicians deemed to be to the Right of Macron. The research team added that 100 per cent of guests asked about the issue of diversity and multiculturalism expressed approval of the ideological precepts.

JOIN THE FSU!
Previous Post

Swiss 15 year-old taken into care after parents refuse to legally endorse gender “transition”

Next Post

“Highly offensive” Albert Memorial draws on “racial stereotypes” and reflects problematic view of “Victorian supremacy”, say its custodians

Join the Free Speech Union

One annual investment for complete peace of mind.

As a member, you’ll have access to an array of resources and support, ensuring you can speak your mind without fear of being cancelled. Our experienced team provides guidance, support and – at our discretion – assistance with legal action. We will defend your right to speak your mind, however unorthodox your views, provided you don’t say anything unlawful.

Join Today

Make a Donation

Listen to our weekly news podcast

Listen to Our Past Interviews & Debates

IN THE MEDIA

News Archive

Join Our Community

Become a Member
Make a Donation

© The Free Speech Union Limited

Quick Links

Member Login
Privacy Policy
Terms and Conditions
Cookie Policy
Legal
FAQs
Facebook Twitter-square Youtube

Organisation Address

The Free Speech Union
85 Great Portland Street

London W1W 7LT
+44 020 3920 7865

Get in Touch
Media Enquiries email

Welcome to the Free Speech Union


If you’re looking for information and guidance, or in need of immediate help, please click the button below:
GET IN TOUCH
  • Become a Member
  • Make a Donation
  • Home
  • About Us
    • About Us
      • Company Staff
      • Founders & Board
      • Advisory Council
      • Legal Advisory Council
      • Writer’s Advisory Council
      • Scottish Advisory Council
      • Northern Ireland Advisory Council
    • The Freedoms We Defend​
      • Freedom of Speech
      • Freedom of Expression
      • Academic Freedom
      • Freedom of the Press
      • Freedom of Religion
    • Scotland
    • Northern Ireland
  • Latest News
  • FAQs
  • Resources
    • Informative Guides
      • Online Offences Related to Civil Disorder FAQs
      • FAQs About Scotland’s Hate Crime Act
      • FAQs About What to do if You’re Contacted by Police Scotland About a Speech-Related Complaint
      • Freedom of Speech Online FAQs
      • Freedom of Expression on Campus FAQs
      • How to Make a Freedom of Information Request
      • Gender Pronouns in the Workplace
      • How to Remove Non Crime Hate Incident from your Police Record
      • Navigating Social Media and the Workplace
      • What to do if You’ve Been De-Banked
      • Anti-Racism and Unconscious Bias Training
      • The Governments Consultation on Reforming the Human Rights Act
    • Briefing Documents
    • Press Releases
    • Media
    • Letters
    • Teaching Materials
  • Videos
  • Podcast
    • Weekly News Podcast
    • Guest Interviews & Debates
  • Events
  • Campaigns
    • Labour’s War on Free Speech
    • Higher Education Act
    • Conversion Therapy Ban
    • Say No to Banter Bouncers
    • Time to Scrap Non-Crime Hate Incidents
  • Apply For a Grant
  • Member Login
  • Shop