In the Media

Articles That Mention the Free Speech Union

Free speech is still in peril on campus

Click here to read the article

The sorry saga of the UK’s Higher Education (Freedom of Speech) Act reached a desultory conclusion this week. While it had been passed in parliament under the previous Conservative government in response to growing concerns about cancel culture on campuses, it had not been implemented by the time of the General Election. Within days of the Labour government taking office in July, it was dumped by the new education secretary, Bridget Phillipson. Following a backlash from academics and threatened legal action from the Free Speech Union, the Freedom of Speech Act has now been revived, albeit in a watered-down form. Whether this new, de-fanged version will be enough to put an end to the No Platforming, cancelling and self-censorship that plagues our universities remains to be seen.

Joanna Williams, Spiked Online, 17th January 2025.

Labour’s university law will be free speech in name only

Click here to read the article

Labour’s initial attempt to kick this late-term Tory legislation into the long grass by pressing the pause button is a worrying sign. It shows that the party is not seriously committed to protecting academic freedom when it inevitably collides with hurt feelings. As Government sources have alleged, the act was a “hate speech charter”. Ministers have only acted because of overwhelming opposition and lobbying from high-profile academics such as Richard Dawkins and an imminent judicial review brought by the Free Speech Union.

Eric Kaufmann, Unherd, 16th January 2025.

Labour revives free speech law — minus controversial clause

Click here to read the article

The act’s introduction preempts a judicial review against its suspension, brought by the Free Speech Union, due to be held at the end of this month. There was an outcry from academics and high-profile campaigners against the act being paused. A letter to the Times, signed by hundreds of supporters, said that academics and students had been hounded, censured, silenced or even sacked over the past 20 years for expressing legal opinions.

Nicola Woolcock, Georgia Lambert, The Times, 15th January 2025.

Bridget Phillipson to revive free speech laws after backlash from academics

Click here to read the article

Ms Phillipson is facing legal action after the Free Speech Union (FSU) launched a High Court case against her suspension of the Act, with a judicial review set to take place on Jan 23. Losing would be a humiliating episode for the Government. The FSU has argued that Ms Phillipson’s decision to pause the legislation went beyond her ministerial powers.

Poppy Wood, The Telegraph, 14th January 2025.

Speake for England, Martin!

Click here to read the article

A well-reasoned intervention, you might think — especially considering the recent Employment Tribunal ruling in the case of Free Speech Union (FSU) member Sean Corby, which affirmed that opposition to CRT constitutes a protected philosophical belief under the Equality Act 2010 (“EqA”). While this ruling emerged from the specific context of an Employment Tribunal, it’s an important precedent that reinforces the legal protections around philosophical beliefs, especially those challenging dominant ideologies.

Freddie Attenborough, The Critic, 14th January 2025.

UK Monitoring of Musk Online Reveals “Pathetic” Priorities

Click here to read the article

Priority concerns aside, Free Speech Union director Toby Young told europeanconservative.com that “the idea the taxpayer needs to fund a government unit to ‘monitor’ Elon Musk’s tweets is ridiculous” since “it costs nothing to open an account on X and once you’ve done that Elon’s tweets are completely unavoidable. What”, asked Young, “is the government’s ‘report’ going to consist of? “A compendium of those tweets? You can see all of them by clicking on Elon’s avatar and it’s completely free.”

Michael Curzon, European Conservative, 10th January 2025.

Je suis Charlie, ten years on

Click here to read the article

That is why, ten years on, the Free Speech Union stands in solidarity with Charlie Hebdo, ensuring that the legacy of those who were murdered endures. This unthinkable atrocity was not merely an attack on a magazine. It was an attack on the principle that no idea, no belief, no religious figure is beyond satire. It was an attempt to impose, through violence, a prohibition on critique. To yield to such demands is to surrender the freedoms that underpin our societies.

Freddie Attenborough, The Critic, 7th January 2025.

Boss of Royal College of Speech and Language Therapists is forced to issue a grovelling apology – after accidentally following Tommy Robinson on X

Click here to read the article

Toby Young, from the Free Speech Union, said: “No one should be penalised for following anyone, let alone a key participant in an ongoing public debate. We cannot hope to solve any of the major problems besetting our society unless we get out of our echo chambers and engage in dialogue with people from all sides.”

Andy Jehring, MailOnline, 6th January 2025.