In the Media

Articles That Mention the Free Speech Union

Salmond’s university snub “breached human rights”

Click here to read the article

In a letter to Professor George Boyne, the university’s principal and vice-chancellor, the Free Speech Union campaign group said “no-platforming Salmond was contrary to Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights”. This defines freedom of expression as including the “freedom to hold opinions and receive and impart information and ideas without interference by public authority”, Toby Young, the union’s general secretary, said. “The students who were planning to attend Mr Salmond’s talk had a right to hear what he was going to say,” Young said. “By cancelling the talk the university golf club was interfering with that right.”

Jeremy Watson, The Times, 30th April 2022.

The police have gone full Orwell

Click here to read the article

This week, Mills finally had his NCHI removed from his record by Kent Police, thanks to the efforts of the Free Speech Union. But while any individual victory like this is welcome, speech will not be truly free in the UK until NCHIs are abolished along with our censorious laws.

Charlie Peters, Spiked, 27th April 2022.

Elon Musk TAKES OVER Twitter – billionaire agrees historic deal with social media giant

Click here to read the article

The Free Speech Union added following the news: “We look forward to an overhaul of the social media company’s content moderation policies so it becomes possible for users to challenge prevailing orthodoxies, whether about the participation of transwomen in women’s sports or the effectiveness of the Covid vaccines, without running the risk of being no-platformed.”

Michael Curzon, The Daily Express, 25th April 2022.

Backlash as Home Office staff are told to add their pronouns to work emails and state whether they want to be called he, she or they

Click here to read the article

The Free Speech Union warned the new rules could breach equalities law, and have written to the Home Office’s top civil servant Sir Matthew Rycroft to complain about the directive. They said: “We are concerned that this instruction, which appears to be mandatory, is a form of compelled speech that violates the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion and the right to free speech and is a breach of the Equality Act 2010.”

Daniel Martin, The Daily Mail, 16th April 2022.