Friday, June 6, 2025
MAKE A DONATION
Get in Touch
The Free Speech Union
Member Login
BECOME A MEMBER
  • Home
  • About Us
    • About Us
      • Company Staff
      • Founders & Board
      • Advisory Council
      • Legal Advisory Council
      • Writer’s Advisory Council
      • Scottish Advisory Council
      • Northern Ireland Advisory Council
    • The Freedoms We Defend​
      • Freedom of Speech
      • Freedom of Expression
      • Academic Freedom
      • Freedom of the Press
      • Freedom of Religion
    • Scotland
    • Northern Ireland
  • Latest News
  • FAQS
  • Resources
    • Informative Guides
      • Online Offences Related to Civil Disorder FAQs
      • FAQs About Scotland’s Hate Crime Act
      • FAQs About What to do if You’re Contacted by Police Scotland About a Speech-Related Complaint
      • Freedom of Speech Online FAQs
      • Freedom of Expression on Campus FAQs
      • How to Make a Freedom of Information Request
      • Gender Pronouns in the Workplace
      • How to Remove Non Crime Hate Incident from your Police Record
      • Navigating Social Media and the Workplace
      • What to do if You’ve Been De-Banked
      • Anti-Racism and Unconscious Bias Training
      • The Governments Consultation on Reforming the Human Rights Act
    • Briefing Documents
    • Press Releases
    • Media
    • Letters
    • Teaching Materials
  • Videos
  • Podcasts
    • Weekly News Podcast
    • Guest Interviews & Debates
  • Events
  • Campaigns
    • Labour’s War on Free Speech
    • Higher Education Act
    • Conversion Therapy Ban
    • Say No to Banter Bouncers
    • Time to Scrap Non-Crime Hate Incidents
  • Apply For a Grant
  • Shop
The Free Speech Union
Join Today

Protect freedom to criticise Islam in law, MPs demand

  • BY Frederick Attenborough
  • June 4, 2025
Protect freedom to criticise Islam in law, MPs demand

The freedom to criticise Islam must be protected, a group of parliamentarians have said following the conviction of FSU member Hamit Coskun for burning a Koran. Conservative MP Nick Timothy, backed by 11 colleagues, is now bringing forward a Bill to close what they see as a dangerous loophole in the Public Order Act and strengthen protections for speech critical of all religions.

Hamit Coskun, 50, was found guilty at Westminster Magistrates’ Court on Monday of using disorderly behaviour “within the hearing or sight of a person likely to be caused harassment, alarm or distress” under section 5 of the Public Order Act 1986. District Judge John McGarva also found that he was “motivated at least in part by hostility towards members of a religious group”, meaning the offence was treated as religiously aggravated under section 31(1)(c) of the Crime and Disorder Act 1998.

On 13 February, Coskun stood outside the Turkish Consulate, held aloft a burning copy of the Quran, and shouted phrases including “Islam is the religion of terrorists” and “the Quran is burning”. He had announced the protest in advance on social media and described it as a political act, intended to highlight what he views as the spread of hardline Islam within his native Turkey under President Erdoǧan.

As Coskun’s legal team noted in pre-trial submissions, the High Court has affirmed that “legitimate protest can be offensive, at least to some, and on occasions must be, if it is to have impact” (Munim Abdul v DPP [2021] EWHC 279 (Admin)). That judgment reflects longstanding Article 10 ECHR case law, which protects not only polite speech but also speech that offends, shocks or disturbs.

Coskun’s barrister, Katy Thorne KC, expanded on that argument in court, contending that the prosecution unlawfully interfered with his Article 10 rights. Political expression, she said, enjoys the highest level of protection.

In support of that submission, the defence cited section 29J of the Public Order Act 1986, which provides that “nothing in this Part shall be read or given effect in a way which prohibits or restricts discussion, criticism or expressions of antipathy, dislike, ridicule, insult or abuse of particular religions or the beliefs or practices of their adherents”. But Judge McGarva rejected that claim, ruling that section 29J applies only to Part 3A of the Act, which covers offences relating to the stirring up of religious hatred, and does not extend to public order offences under section 5, which falls under Part 1.

That legal outcome proved decisive in the outcome of the trial. It also exposed a gap in the law that Conservative MP Nick Timothy is now seeking to close.

Next week, he will introduce a Freedom of Expression (Religion) Bill in the House of Commons. Co-signed by 11 MPs, the Bill would extend the protections of section 29J to cover both section 4A and section 5 of the Public Order Act, the very provisions used to convict Coskun.

Mr Timothy and his co-signatories argue that without reform, section 29J offers little meaningful protection. The result, as Hamit’s case shows, is that individuals who criticise religion, particularly Islam, can still face prosecution, even when their speech is political, peaceful, and protected by Article 10.

Speaking to the Telegraph, Mr Timothy warned that the law is now being used to prosecute legitimate criticism and protest regarding Islam, effectively reviving blasphemy laws in all but name. “Parliament never voted for it, and the country doesn’t want it.”

“To use the Public Order Act in this way is completely unacceptable, and to argue the protester was shown to be guilty of disorderly conduct because he was attacked by others is grotesque. I will introduce a Bill to put a stop to all of this next week. I challenge the Government to support it.”

Sir Gavin Williamson, one of the MPs backing the Bill, said: “This Bill rightly draws a clear line in rejecting any attempt to introduce blasphemy laws through the back door.

“Britain abolished such laws to uphold open debate, critical thought, and the principle that no idea or belief is beyond scrutiny. That must not be undone.”

The Free Speech Union (FSU) paid for Coskun’s legal fees alongside the National Secular Society (NSS).

Welcoming the Bill, Lord Young of Acton, the director and founder of the FSU, said: “We’re helping Hamit Coskun appeal his conviction and we’re optimistic it will be overturned, but that’s a laborious, expensive process and it would be helpful if the law was clarified so the Crown Prosecution Service stops prosecuting people who protest against Islam or any other religion.”

You can donate to Hamit’s legal crowdfunder here.

Previous Post

Police accused of vilifying gender-critical views as ‘Nazi’ in internal communication

Next Post

Publisher settles case after claiming she was ‘hounded out’ over gender-critical views

Join the Free Speech Union

One annual investment for complete peace of mind.

As a member, you’ll have access to an array of resources and support, ensuring you can speak your mind without fear of being cancelled. Our experienced team provides guidance, support and – at our discretion – assistance with legal action. We will defend your right to speak your mind, however unorthodox your views, provided you don’t say anything unlawful.

Join Today

Make a Donation

Listen to our weekly news podcast

Listen to Our Past Interviews & Debates

IN THE MEDIA

News Archive

Join Our Community

Become a Member
Make a Donation

© The Free Speech Union Limited

Quick Links

Member Login
Privacy Policy
Terms and Conditions
Cookie Policy
Legal
FAQs
Facebook Twitter-square Youtube

Organisation Address

The Free Speech Union
85 Great Portland Street

London W1W 7LT
+44 020 3920 7865

Get in Touch
Media Enquiries email

Welcome to the Free Speech Union


If you’re looking for information and guidance, or in need of immediate help, please click the button below:
GET IN TOUCH
  • Become a Member
  • Make a Donation
  • Home
  • About Us
    • About Us
      • Company Staff
      • Founders & Board
      • Advisory Council
      • Legal Advisory Council
      • Writer’s Advisory Council
      • Scottish Advisory Council
      • Northern Ireland Advisory Council
    • The Freedoms We Defend​
      • Freedom of Speech
      • Freedom of Expression
      • Academic Freedom
      • Freedom of the Press
      • Freedom of Religion
    • Scotland
    • Northern Ireland
  • Latest News
  • FAQs
  • Resources
    • Informative Guides
      • Online Offences Related to Civil Disorder FAQs
      • FAQs About Scotland’s Hate Crime Act
      • FAQs About What to do if You’re Contacted by Police Scotland About a Speech-Related Complaint
      • Freedom of Speech Online FAQs
      • Freedom of Expression on Campus FAQs
      • How to Make a Freedom of Information Request
      • Gender Pronouns in the Workplace
      • How to Remove Non Crime Hate Incident from your Police Record
      • Navigating Social Media and the Workplace
      • What to do if You’ve Been De-Banked
      • Anti-Racism and Unconscious Bias Training
      • The Governments Consultation on Reforming the Human Rights Act
    • Briefing Documents
    • Press Releases
    • Media
    • Letters
    • Teaching Materials
  • Videos
  • Podcast
    • Weekly News Podcast
    • Guest Interviews & Debates
  • Events
  • Campaigns
    • Labour’s War on Free Speech
    • Higher Education Act
    • Conversion Therapy Ban
    • Say No to Banter Bouncers
    • Time to Scrap Non-Crime Hate Incidents
  • Apply For a Grant
  • Member Login
  • Shop