Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

The EDI Tax: How Equity, Diversity and Inclusion is Hobbling British Businesses

Thomas Harris

Summary

According to a representative survey of British workers, authoritarian Equity, Diversity, Inclusion and Climate (EDIC) training has become endemic in British workplaces, with 65% of employees saying they have been put through some kind of diversity training, either by their present or former employer.

EDIC training is supposed to make offices more inclusive, attractive places to work, particularly for members of historically disadvantaged groups. But according to the people we surveyed, it’s having the opposite effect – and is particularly unpopular among ethnic minorities and members of the LGBT communities. Sixty-two per cent of workers said they have had to conceal what they really think about the training they’ve received, including 22% who have been compelled to say things that they don’t really believe. This rises to 31% among Black and Asian respondents.

Forty-five per cent reported that the training they’d received conflicted with their personal, religious or political views, with 31% saying  they had left a job because of their employer’s promotion of woke ideology. This figure is higher among minority groups – 43% for Black employees, 46% for Asian and 46% for LGBT.

Perhaps most shocking of all, 36% said they had witnessed staff being penalised in some way by their current employer because they challenged EDIC training. This includes 12% who have witnessed staff being fired for doing so.

The author of the report, Thomas Harris, the FSU’s Director of Data and Impact, concludes that our whole approach to diversity training needs to be overhauled. There is no evidence the current approach is making Britain’s offices more welcoming, friendlier places to work, and plenty of evidence that it is turning them into hostile environments, particularly for minorities and those who do not subscribe to woke ideology.

Postscript: This briefing paper now includes an appendix documenting two egregious, real-world examples of EDI training in which employees are not allowed to challenge the trainers’ ideological biases. The first is a training course called Glamazon that anyone at Amazon with supervisory responsibilities is required to do, while the second is a guide produced by The Royal College of Speech and Language Therapists, a professional association, that’s intended for all speech and language therapists, as well as support workers and students.

Full Briefing