Saturday, June 7, 2025
MAKE A DONATION
Get in Touch
The Free Speech Union
Member Login
BECOME A MEMBER
  • Home
  • About Us
    • About Us
      • Company Staff
      • Founders & Board
      • Advisory Council
      • Legal Advisory Council
      • Writer’s Advisory Council
      • Scottish Advisory Council
      • Northern Ireland Advisory Council
    • The Freedoms We Defend​
      • Freedom of Speech
      • Freedom of Expression
      • Academic Freedom
      • Freedom of the Press
      • Freedom of Religion
    • Scotland
    • Northern Ireland
  • Latest News
  • FAQS
  • Resources
    • Informative Guides
      • Online Offences Related to Civil Disorder FAQs
      • FAQs About Scotland’s Hate Crime Act
      • FAQs About What to do if You’re Contacted by Police Scotland About a Speech-Related Complaint
      • Freedom of Speech Online FAQs
      • Freedom of Expression on Campus FAQs
      • How to Make a Freedom of Information Request
      • Gender Pronouns in the Workplace
      • How to Remove Non Crime Hate Incident from your Police Record
      • Navigating Social Media and the Workplace
      • What to do if You’ve Been De-Banked
      • Anti-Racism and Unconscious Bias Training
      • The Governments Consultation on Reforming the Human Rights Act
    • Briefing Documents
    • Press Releases
    • Media
    • Letters
    • Teaching Materials
  • Videos
  • Podcasts
    • Weekly News Podcast
    • Guest Interviews & Debates
  • Events
  • Campaigns
    • Labour’s War on Free Speech
    • Higher Education Act
    • Conversion Therapy Ban
    • Say No to Banter Bouncers
    • Time to Scrap Non-Crime Hate Incidents
  • Apply For a Grant
  • Shop
The Free Speech Union
Join Today

Top prosecutor: I had no idea what non-crime hate incidents were

  • BY Frederick Attenborough
  • November 20, 2024
Top prosecutor: I had no idea what non-crime hate incidents were

Stephen Parkinson, the director of public prosecutions, claims he had to look up the term when a row broke out last week. The Times has the story.

Britain’s top prosecutor has said that he “had no idea” what non-crime hate incidents were and “had to look them up” recently, as he cast doubt on their usefulness.

Stephen Parkinson, the director of public prosecutions, was responding to concern over revelations that police regularly logged hate incidents against people in authority even though their actions did not amount to criminal offences.

The Times reported last week that doctors, vicars and social workers were among the professionals investigated by police over non-crime hate incidents (NCHIs).

It has subsequently emerged that one home counties police force recorded 1,500 hate incidents over the past two years.

On Tuesday Parkinson told The Times Crime and Justice Commission that when the furore around non-crime hate incidents broke out last week, “I had to look up what on earth the term meant — I was puzzled by it”.

Parkinson, who took over as the chief prosecutor in England and Wales a year ago, went on to tell the commission that “even within the police service there has been some surprise at the level of non-crime hate incidents that have been investigated”.

Despite his position, Parkinson said that he was not certain how investigations of NCHIs were started.

In September a report by HM Inspectorate of Constabulary found that confusion over the rules meant that officers were taking a risk-averse approach, summed up as “if in doubt, record a crime”.

Speaking at the annual conference of the National Police Chiefs’ Council, Yvette Cooper, the home secretary, defended the principle of recording non-crime hate incidents. She said: “You have to really have a common sense and consistent approach. And one of the other things I think that the inspectorate report shows is around the importance, for example, of monitoring things like antisemitism, which has increased over the last 12 months, and that is immensely important.”

Parkinson, 67, told the commission that although he found the definition and recording of NCHIs to be confusing and potentially unnecessary, he was reluctant to be “overly critical of the police”.

He pointed out that many of the non-crime hate cases “could start as ordinary criminal investigations that are ultimately recorded in a different way”.

However, his concern over the wide recording of the incidents was shared by other senior figures in the justice system.

One senior retired judge who did not wish to be named told The Times that the process of determining an incident was confused, which in effect rendered the exercise pointless.

A leading criminal law KC who was highly familiar with the workings of the Crown Prosecution Service acknowledged that there was a place for “out of court disposals”, such as conditional cautions for actual criminal offences.

However, in relation to NCHIs, the lawyer said that there were “questions over whether the police should be doing this type of recording at all”.

Worth reading in full.

Previous Post

The police handle crimes against Jews strangely leniently

Next Post

School removes Christmas references from panto to make children feel ‘safe and valued’

Join the Free Speech Union

One annual investment for complete peace of mind.

As a member, you’ll have access to an array of resources and support, ensuring you can speak your mind without fear of being cancelled. Our experienced team provides guidance, support and – at our discretion – assistance with legal action. We will defend your right to speak your mind, however unorthodox your views, provided you don’t say anything unlawful.

Join Today

Make a Donation

Listen to our weekly news podcast

Listen to Our Past Interviews & Debates

IN THE MEDIA

News Archive

Join Our Community

Become a Member
Make a Donation

© The Free Speech Union Limited

Quick Links

Member Login
Privacy Policy
Terms and Conditions
Cookie Policy
Legal
FAQs
Facebook Twitter-square Youtube

Organisation Address

The Free Speech Union
85 Great Portland Street

London W1W 7LT
+44 020 3920 7865

Get in Touch
Media Enquiries email

Welcome to the Free Speech Union


If you’re looking for information and guidance, or in need of immediate help, please click the button below:
GET IN TOUCH
  • Become a Member
  • Make a Donation
  • Home
  • About Us
    • About Us
      • Company Staff
      • Founders & Board
      • Advisory Council
      • Legal Advisory Council
      • Writer’s Advisory Council
      • Scottish Advisory Council
      • Northern Ireland Advisory Council
    • The Freedoms We Defend​
      • Freedom of Speech
      • Freedom of Expression
      • Academic Freedom
      • Freedom of the Press
      • Freedom of Religion
    • Scotland
    • Northern Ireland
  • Latest News
  • FAQs
  • Resources
    • Informative Guides
      • Online Offences Related to Civil Disorder FAQs
      • FAQs About Scotland’s Hate Crime Act
      • FAQs About What to do if You’re Contacted by Police Scotland About a Speech-Related Complaint
      • Freedom of Speech Online FAQs
      • Freedom of Expression on Campus FAQs
      • How to Make a Freedom of Information Request
      • Gender Pronouns in the Workplace
      • How to Remove Non Crime Hate Incident from your Police Record
      • Navigating Social Media and the Workplace
      • What to do if You’ve Been De-Banked
      • Anti-Racism and Unconscious Bias Training
      • The Governments Consultation on Reforming the Human Rights Act
    • Briefing Documents
    • Press Releases
    • Media
    • Letters
    • Teaching Materials
  • Videos
  • Podcast
    • Weekly News Podcast
    • Guest Interviews & Debates
  • Events
  • Campaigns
    • Labour’s War on Free Speech
    • Higher Education Act
    • Conversion Therapy Ban
    • Say No to Banter Bouncers
    • Time to Scrap Non-Crime Hate Incidents
  • Apply For a Grant
  • Member Login
  • Shop