Thursday, May 29, 2025
MAKE A DONATION
Get in Touch
The Free Speech Union
Member Login
BECOME A MEMBER
  • Home
  • About Us
    • About Us
      • Company Staff
      • Founders & Board
      • Advisory Council
      • Legal Advisory Council
      • Writer’s Advisory Council
      • Scottish Advisory Council
      • Northern Ireland Advisory Council
    • The Freedoms We Defend​
      • Freedom of Speech
      • Freedom of Expression
      • Academic Freedom
      • Freedom of the Press
      • Freedom of Religion
    • Scotland
    • Northern Ireland
  • Latest News
  • FAQS
  • Resources
    • Informative Guides
      • Online Offences Related to Civil Disorder FAQs
      • FAQs About Scotland’s Hate Crime Act
      • FAQs About What to do if You’re Contacted by Police Scotland About a Speech-Related Complaint
      • Freedom of Speech Online FAQs
      • Freedom of Expression on Campus FAQs
      • How to Make a Freedom of Information Request
      • Gender Pronouns in the Workplace
      • How to Remove Non Crime Hate Incident from your Police Record
      • Navigating Social Media and the Workplace
      • What to do if You’ve Been De-Banked
      • Anti-Racism and Unconscious Bias Training
      • The Governments Consultation on Reforming the Human Rights Act
    • Briefing Documents
    • Press Releases
    • Media
    • Letters
    • Teaching Materials
  • Videos
  • Podcasts
    • Weekly News Podcast
    • Guest Interviews & Debates
  • Events
  • Campaigns
    • Labour’s War on Free Speech
    • Higher Education Act
    • Conversion Therapy Ban
    • Say No to Banter Bouncers
    • Time to Scrap Non-Crime Hate Incidents
  • Apply For a Grant
  • Shop
The Free Speech Union
Join Today

Why won’t Labour stand up for free speech?

  • BY Frederick Attenborough
  • March 20, 2025
Why won’t Labour stand up for free speech?

Free speech in the UK is under attack – not through state censorship, but via the legal system itself, writes David Hooper for CapX. Wealthy individuals, corporations, and states are weaponising Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation (SLAPPs) to intimidate journalists, campaigners, and whistleblowers into silence. These lawsuits aren’t about winning, but about making legal threats so costly and stressful that critics back down before reaching court.

SLAPPs thrive in the UK due to claimant-friendly defamation laws, where the burden of proof rests on the defendant. Even truthful reporting becomes prohibitively expensive to defend. Powerful figures exploit libel, data protection, and privacy laws to suppress investigative journalism, forcing journalists and publishers into self-censorship.

London’s reputation as the ‘libel capital of the world’ has made it a hub for international reputation launderers. Oligarchs, fraudsters, and politicians use the UK’s legal system to quash dissent, targeting both British and foreign journalists. So why has Labour delayed action on anti-SLAPPs legislation?

Here’s an extract from David Hooper’s article:

The UK is the destination of choice for SLAPPsters and reputation launderers. The burden of proof is on the publisher and it can cost millions.

Not only have Russians, often with prison records, as well as Ukrainians, Kazakhs, Azerbaijanis, Swedes, Greeks, Germans, Maltese and Chinese brought or threatened SLAPP claims in this country, but England has exported its libel expertise. As the Foreign Policy Centre reported, the UK ‘is by far the most frequent international country of origin for such legal threats’. When Daphne Caruana Galizia was murdered in Malta in 2017, she faced 42 libel and 5 criminal libel claims, often from English solicitors.

Some 33 US states have anti-SLAPPs laws. In April 2024 the EU passed an anti-SLAPPs directive requiring implementation within two years and the Council of Europe (46 states and 675 million people) adopted recommendations for setting minimum standards and a regime for tackling SLAPPs. Canada has in place the most effective anti-SLAPPs laws, and has recently published statistics about their operation.

The UK is lagging behind. An anti-SLAPPs law was belatedly shoehorned into the Economic Crimes and Corporate Transparency Act 2023, but restricted to economic crimes. The definition of economic crimes and SLAPPs have the hallmarks of a legal beanfeast. Wayne David introduced a private member’s bill to remedy these defects, but it foundered with the July 2024 election.

There was no anti-SLAPPs act in the King’s Speech. Although Keir Starmer says Labour will introduce anti-SLAPPs legislation, in November 2024 Heidi Alexander MP, then Minister of State at the MoJ, indicated it was not a priority. The government wished to review the operation of the new civil procedure rules enabling SLAPP claims to be dismissed and to await the report of a SLAPPs subcommittee in early 2025. The House of Lords Communications and Digital Committee complained in its Future of News report: ‘the absence of political will to deal with this issue reflects poorly on the government’s values and commitments to justice’. The committee felt such a law should be prioritised and that the Solicitors Regulatory Authority’s fining limit of £25,000 was ‘a peashooter against a tank’. They wanted solicitors not only held accountable for the actions of private investigators and PR consultants they hired, but also to inquire more closely into their clients’ background and the source of their funds. In early February, the Government declined to change its position.

There needs to be a fundamental reassessment of SLAPPs. We should learn from mainland Europe how libel claims are dealt with swiftly and at a minute fraction of the cost here. The public interest defence in libel claims should be reviewed. It all too often focuses on the quality of the journalism. Rather a balance should be struck – as happens in Canada – between the public interest in the freedom of speech and the right to information against the claimant’s need to bring a libel action The excessive cost of libel actions favours the wealthy but excludes the less well-off. 

Worth reading in full.

The paperback of David Hooper’s book ‘Buying Silence. How Oligarchs, Corporations and Plutocrats Use the Law to Gag their Critics’ is published by Biteback on 20 March.

Previous Post

Hamster forum and local residents’ websites shut down by new internet laws

Next Post

Far-Left campaigners accused of attacking GB News

Join the Free Speech Union

One annual investment for complete peace of mind.

As a member, you’ll have access to an array of resources and support, ensuring you can speak your mind without fear of being cancelled. Our experienced team provides guidance, support and – at our discretion – assistance with legal action. We will defend your right to speak your mind, however unorthodox your views, provided you don’t say anything unlawful.

Join Today

Make a Donation

Listen to our weekly news podcast

Listen to Our Past Interviews & Debates

IN THE MEDIA

News Archive

Join Our Community

Become a Member
Make a Donation

© The Free Speech Union Limited

Quick Links

Member Login
Privacy Policy
Terms and Conditions
Cookie Policy
Legal
FAQs
Facebook Twitter-square Youtube

Organisation Address

The Free Speech Union
85 Great Portland Street

London W1W 7LT
+44 020 3920 7865

Get in Touch
Media Enquiries email

Welcome to the Free Speech Union


If you’re looking for information and guidance, or in need of immediate help, please click the button below:
GET IN TOUCH
  • Become a Member
  • Make a Donation
  • Home
  • About Us
    • About Us
      • Company Staff
      • Founders & Board
      • Advisory Council
      • Legal Advisory Council
      • Writer’s Advisory Council
      • Scottish Advisory Council
      • Northern Ireland Advisory Council
    • The Freedoms We Defend​
      • Freedom of Speech
      • Freedom of Expression
      • Academic Freedom
      • Freedom of the Press
      • Freedom of Religion
    • Scotland
    • Northern Ireland
  • Latest News
  • FAQs
  • Resources
    • Informative Guides
      • Online Offences Related to Civil Disorder FAQs
      • FAQs About Scotland’s Hate Crime Act
      • FAQs About What to do if You’re Contacted by Police Scotland About a Speech-Related Complaint
      • Freedom of Speech Online FAQs
      • Freedom of Expression on Campus FAQs
      • How to Make a Freedom of Information Request
      • Gender Pronouns in the Workplace
      • How to Remove Non Crime Hate Incident from your Police Record
      • Navigating Social Media and the Workplace
      • What to do if You’ve Been De-Banked
      • Anti-Racism and Unconscious Bias Training
      • The Governments Consultation on Reforming the Human Rights Act
    • Briefing Documents
    • Press Releases
    • Media
    • Letters
    • Teaching Materials
  • Videos
  • Podcast
    • Weekly News Podcast
    • Guest Interviews & Debates
  • Events
  • Campaigns
    • Labour’s War on Free Speech
    • Higher Education Act
    • Conversion Therapy Ban
    • Say No to Banter Bouncers
    • Time to Scrap Non-Crime Hate Incidents
  • Apply For a Grant
  • Member Login
  • Shop